For White Folks Who Teach in the Hood… and the Rest of Y’all
Too was written by Christopher Emdin in 2016. I learned about it over the
summer of 2019, when I saw he was enlisted to speak at ACTFL. I immediately purchased
his book and set to reading it. I just finished. This book is equal parts
graduate-level study of pedagogy and its relation to urban education, and true
tales from an urban teacher. As I much prefer fiction to non, I did proceed
very slowly through this book. There are lots of good points for reflection, so
I tended to only read five to ten pages at a time, then reflect and go back for
another round. That makes 200-page books last a very long time.
My very favorite parts were the stories from his personal
teaching experiences. He told a lot of stories that sounded so familiar, and I
was surprised that he and I could have shared such similar experiences.
Although, I have to admit that I finally understood (on page 197) why I was
failing to connect with so many of his ideas. This is because he spoke explicitly
about working with middle school, high school, and college teachers and
students. No wonder I didn’t think many of his ideas would work with my kids, they
are based on reflection and cognitive evaluation that six-year-olds typically
cannot express sufficiently. He also gives a lot of ideas that build off special
groups that meet afterschool. That is quite hard to manage when you are a
traveling teacher and there is no such thing as an activity bus. So, with that bias spoken, let me share with
you what I loved and why I think this is a valuable book for teachers of older
students. (I’m not saying it lacks value for elementary teachers, it will just
take a bit of effort to reimagine what these ideas look like with a younger
group. My experience shows that there is a much wider gap in the reflective
abilities of a seven-year-old and a 12-year-old than between a 12-year-old and
a 22-year-old, most of which revolves around the ability to put feelings into
words.)
I have to share with you my absolute favorite quote from the
book, which falls on the very last page (206): “The kind of teacher you will
become is directly related to the kind of teacher you associate with.” He goes
on to talk about misery actively recruiting company, which I imagine all of us
have seen and/or participated in at some point. But I see it in a different
way, if you actively seek to push your fellow teachers to seek out the best
tools for your trade and they follow you, then they will push you to do the
same. He even shares stories throughout the book that expresses how he had the
same experience. When we open our minds to see the potential of what things can
be, then we create a safe place for those around us to do the same. I believe
this is true for our coworkers as well as our students. I always tell my older
students (who I test all my newest ideas on) when we are trying something new
and what I hope to gain from it. If I am nervous, then I tell them what I worry
might go wrong, in doing so I believe I have avoided those endings all
together. When they know that I’m not always super confident about trying new
things, then they know they don’t have to be either. But we still try them. And
then we reflect, and then we improve (or forget) whatever it was. Either way,
through our trial we have created a safer space for risk taking, and I venture
that nothing is riskier in a classroom than speaking with new words about new
things.
My second favorite quote (found on page 112) speaks about a
potential reason for students who behave in ways that the teacher may not
appreciate. He is speaking about how intelligence is perceived, and how the
behavior of begin smart is commonly aligned with the behavior of the white
middle-class. Thus, it can be difficult to be viewed as intelligent for students
who are not well versed in those behaviors. In his words: “Rather than preform
smartness, they deliberately act out an exaggerated version of what the teacher
has chosen not to recognize.” I find these words so powerful, because even the
youngest students do this. If a teacher fails to acknowledge a student and his/her
way of knowing then they disengage, and their disengagement results in our
inability to push them into a deeper understanding of the content and the
world. By recognizing our own inability to know all the ways of knowing the
world, we are opening up space to learn the world of the students we don’t understand.
Emdin also gives ideas for how to open the classroom to these
students, who he calls neoindigenous. First, he recommends call and response,
as seen in many black churches. He tells stories of watching black preachers
and how they use the tone of their voice and their words to ask the
congregation to follow them through the sermon, to get their permission to move
forward, to build energy, and to dissipate energy. These calls and responses
can easily be built into any subject, and in languages can include calls that
already exist in the culture of the language (classroom teachers I teach with
use, with good effect “shark bait/bruhaha” and everyone knows “class class/yes
yes”). In Spanish, I have opened class with ¿Qué te pasa calabaza? / Nada Nada limonada, as a way to transition
from wherever the students were before I walked in the room to being ready for
Spanish. Ironically, I stopped doing this because I made it a student job, and
my student would do it up to five times before sitting down and that just wasn’t
what I had imagined… oops. This is a procedure I’ll be bringing back now…
He also highly believes in cogenerative dialogues, which is roughly
creating a focus group for your classroom. Some students are invited to help
join you in your reflective process. These students learn to reflect on the
teaching practices in the classroom and help the teacher improve upon them.
They can even be asked to teach lessons, after being instructed privately on
the subject and presenting a well-built lesson plan. Once a cogenerative
dialogue group is built, he recommends swapping out members for others in
class, so that all who are interested can have an opportunity to improve their
learning experience. As a spin off of cogenerative dialogues, he suggests cosmo
duos, which are pairs of students who are encouraged to share with each other their
triumphs and struggles in class, and then work together to celebrate or improve
the situations.
His bottom line is easily understood as being invest in the
students and they will invest in you. Meet them where they are, and they will
show you what their reality is. You must understand their reality, or be visibly
open to learning, before you can reach your fullest potential as an educator of
students.